Comments on: Consequences of the war in Iraq http://community.gjsentinel.com/2008/02/20/consequences-of-the-war-in-iraq/ Grand Junction, Colorado's community Web site, discussions, forums, message boards and more. Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:04:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Willis Leon Johnson http://community.gjsentinel.com/2008/02/20/consequences-of-the-war-in-iraq/#comment-24 Willis Leon Johnson Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:07:20 +0000 http://community.gjsentinel.com/2008/02/20/consequences-of-the-war-in-iraq/#comment-24 David, your post is interesting simply for the fact that your position is NOT based on fact, only democrat political rhetoric. Iraq DID have WMDs. Iraq WAS actively training terrorists and suicide bomber. Iraq WAS a terror supporting nation. Iraq WAS a threat to the entire Middle East, and as such, a DIRECT THREAT to United States interests. In addition to actual, legitimate reasons for us to remove saddam, there are always the politically correct reasons. He murdered innocent people, and what democrats didn't cry him/her self to sleep every night over THAT? The entire democrat position is based on two things. A; It's a Republican President, and he must be made to look bad! And B: It's the big bad military, and they must not be allowed to win, at least not under this President. As far as the economic problems facing this Nation, it's FAILED DEMOCRAT POLICIES that have caused them. Prior to looney bin johnson, there were few federal programs that interfered with the Free Enterprise System. If you should choose do to so, there are literally TONS of documentation of all the democrat pushed policies that has pretty much destroyed the medical field, Social Security, and every other aspect of the economy. But, since your tone indicates that you probably not willing to make an effort to learn, we are going to have to put up with irrational, toe the party line, rhetoric from you in the future. It makes it worth my time to wake up every morning. David, your post is interesting simply for the fact that your position is NOT based on fact, only democrat political rhetoric.

Iraq DID have WMDs.
Iraq WAS actively training terrorists and suicide bomber.
Iraq WAS a terror supporting nation.
Iraq WAS a threat to the entire Middle East, and as such, a DIRECT THREAT to United States interests.

In addition to actual, legitimate reasons for us to remove saddam, there are always the politically correct reasons.

He murdered innocent people, and what democrats didn’t cry him/her self to sleep every night over THAT?

The entire democrat position is based on two things.

A; It’s a Republican President, and he must be made to look bad!

And

B: It’s the big bad military, and they must not be allowed to win, at least not under this President.

As far as the economic problems facing this Nation, it’s FAILED DEMOCRAT POLICIES that have caused them.

Prior to looney bin johnson, there were few federal programs that interfered with the Free Enterprise System.

If you should choose do to so, there are literally TONS of documentation of all the democrat pushed policies that has pretty much destroyed the medical field, Social Security, and every other aspect of the economy.

But, since your tone indicates that you probably not willing to make an effort to learn, we are going to have to put up with irrational, toe the party line, rhetoric from you in the future.

It makes it worth my time to wake up every morning.

]]>