<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Printed letters, April 30, 2008</title>
	<link>http://community.gjsentinel.com/2008/04/30/printed-letters-april-30-2008/</link>
	<description>Grand Junction, Colorado's community Web site, discussions, forums, message boards, wiki and more.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Willis_Leon_Johnson</title>
		<link>http://community.gjsentinel.com/2008/04/30/printed-letters-april-30-2008/#comment-1642</link>
		<dc:creator>Willis_Leon_Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://community.gjsentinel.com/2008/04/30/printed-letters-april-30-2008/#comment-1642</guid>
		<description>To Pat Kelly,

" - The rights of free speech and peaceable assembly were considered important enough to be guaranteed in Article 1 of the bill of Right. The suggestion that those who act on these rights go where they will be imprisoned or killed is an ugly mockery of our freedoms.- "

Your right to peaceably assemble were in no way abrogated by anybody.

The suggestion that the 'protesters' go to those places in the world to sit down with the people who would gleefully murder every American was so they could sit down and make peace with those people.

I had no idea that they would not be willing to sit down and play pacifist and give up on their plans of destroying Isreal, the United States, and every other infidel country.

Now, if you are willing to acknowledge that pacificism has never, not will ever work in this world, then just say so.

But, I did not understand this statement.

 " -When peach arrives, Messers Windscheffel and Tallarico may opt to exercise these same rights and assemble peaceably to advocated war.-"

What does the fruit harvest have to do with it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Pat Kelly,</p>
<p>&#8221; - The rights of free speech and peaceable assembly were considered important enough to be guaranteed in Article 1 of the bill of Right. The suggestion that those who act on these rights go where they will be imprisoned or killed is an ugly mockery of our freedoms.- &#8221;</p>
<p>Your right to peaceably assemble were in no way abrogated by anybody.</p>
<p>The suggestion that the &#8216;protesters&#8217; go to those places in the world to sit down with the people who would gleefully murder every American was so they could sit down and make peace with those people.</p>
<p>I had no idea that they would not be willing to sit down and play pacifist and give up on their plans of destroying Isreal, the United States, and every other infidel country.</p>
<p>Now, if you are willing to acknowledge that pacificism has never, not will ever work in this world, then just say so.</p>
<p>But, I did not understand this statement.</p>
<p> &#8221; -When peach arrives, Messers Windscheffel and Tallarico may opt to exercise these same rights and assemble peaceably to advocated war.-&#8221;</p>
<p>What does the fruit harvest have to do with it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RogerMoore</title>
		<link>http://community.gjsentinel.com/2008/04/30/printed-letters-april-30-2008/#comment-1641</link>
		<dc:creator>RogerMoore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://community.gjsentinel.com/2008/04/30/printed-letters-april-30-2008/#comment-1641</guid>
		<description>Mr. Fox should read Dr. Singer's resume instead of the blogs. 
Dr. Singer has been involved in atmospheric research since the 1950's for universities and the US government. 
He is controversial since he will voice a different opinion.
Isn't accepting large amounts of government money to pursue a conclusion just as bad as accepting industry money?
Roger Moore
GJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Fox should read Dr. Singer&#8217;s resume instead of the blogs.<br />
Dr. Singer has been involved in atmospheric research since the 1950&#8217;s for universities and the US government.<br />
He is controversial since he will voice a different opinion.<br />
Isn&#8217;t accepting large amounts of government money to pursue a conclusion just as bad as accepting industry money?<br />
Roger Moore<br />
GJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
