Welcome! Please Login or Register.  

Congressional sessions have no public participation

  • Time Posted 5 months, 4 days ago in General.
  • 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars 3 votes. Average 2.33/5
    Loading ... Loading ...
  • Comments Comments
Tags:   Share:  
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • BlinkList

Creighton Bricker’s June 18 letter to the editor exposes a curious anomaly in our constitutional system. The U.S. Supreme Court has no authority to tell our Congress not to pray or how, even though it is the court’s exclusive function to say what the law is. Such is not true as to the Grand Junction City Council.

Because Congress and the judiciary are co-equal branches of government, the separation-of-powers doctrine prevents the Supreme Court from interfering with the operation of Congress. Thus, even though sectarian prayers by congressional chaplains are just as unconstitutional as similar invocations before City Council meetings, only Congress can police itself. In an election year, there is little likelihood that a member will complain.

Please also recall that congressional sessions involve no public participation (in contrast to City Council or county commissioner meetings). Thus, technically, the invocations are exclusively for the benefit of the members, not the public. No such invocations are typically offered at committee and/or subcommittee hearings at which testimony is to be taken (even though witnesses may swear or affirm to tell the truth).

While the First Amendment commands that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion…,” our Supreme Court acknowledged in the Marsh case that the historical practice of “legislative prayer” conducted by an official chaplain constitutes an allowable exception to the general rule against affiliating the government with religion.

In other words, even though Congress itself doesn’t practice what the Supreme Court preaches, the Establishment Clause nevertheless applies to all subordinate governmental entities — including the Grand Junction City Council — and permits only nonsectarian references to a “ceremonial deity,” or else no invocations at all.

Bill Hugenberg
Grand Junction

One Response to “Congressional sessions have no public participation”


  1. Classof52

    Excellent analysis Mr. Hugenberg. Ilustrates rather nicely just how shallow the reasoning of Creighton Bricker is on this particular issue and indeed on just about everything else he has written for public consumption.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.