Welcome! Please Login or Register.  

More facts needed on public safety project

  • Time Posted 1 year, 3 months ago in General.
  • 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
    Loading ... Loading ...
  • Comments Comments
Tags:   Share:  
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • BlinkList

The current police building and main fire station are heaps. The city wants an all-or-nothing $98 million city sales tax increase and TABOR manipulation for a two-block-long, three-story public safety facility, new main firehouse and three remote fire stations.

Of course, there will likely be millions in cost overruns. If it is so badly needed, why was it not built before the Riverside Parkway ($13 million over budget and a big debt owed)?

With several tax-and-spend initiatives on the 2008 ballot, more likely for 2009 and a tough economy, now comes this project.

The city has $60 million 2009 discretionary excess funds and could apply some to this project. But city officials want new money via increased sales taxes and tampering with TABOR revenue limits.

Petroleum companies may tire of area environmentalists, cap the wells and depart (they don’t need us), which would be a financial disaster.

So, fix the overdone Taj Mahal and landscape design, get more citizen input and actually use it if it is worthwhile. The city should use some of the 2009 excess, time limit the sales tax on the ballot. Disclose today how much the architect has cost so far and their total fees and how they were picked.

It’s about what’s needed and it’s about what we will really get for our money and how much we will actually pay and for how long. No more word games.

JIM SHULTS
Grand Junction

3 Responses to “More facts needed on public safety project”


  1. Willis_Leon_Johnson

    GASP!!!

    Jim, are you actually requesting HONEST answers from the city officials?

    You do realize that we will NEVER get anything resembling ‘honesty’ from the city of grand junction?


  2. Classof52

    WLJ: You do realize that we will NEVER get anything resembling ‘honesty’ from the city of grand junction?

    And Willis keeps insisting that he is not really a bitter person.


  3. Willis_Leon_Johnson

    But classless, I’m not bitter, just HONEST, a concept so foreign to you that you think it’s a car model or something.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.