Welcome! Please Login or Register.  

Rule would allow health-care workers to act on moral convictions

  • Time Posted 3 months, 2 days ago in General.
  • 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
    Loading ... Loading ...
  • Comments Comments
Tags:   Share:  
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • BlinkList

Recently the federal Department of Human Services issued proposed rules that would protect the conscience rights of health-care workers in facilities that receive federal funding. Simply put, it means that a hospital or other facility that receives a federal grant could not force a doctor, nurse or other worker to perform an abortion or sterilization if that would conflict with the worker’s moral convictions.

Planned Parenthood and other abortion advocates are telling their supporters that this is a “radical” gift from the Bush administration to pro-life supporters, but that just isn’t true. Since 1973, federal law has consistently protected pro-life health-care workers from reprisals such as termination and de-certification when they act on their beliefs. The proposed rule simply enforces what has been the sense of Congress for the past 35 years.

It’s simply false to suggest, as Planned Parenthood has, that the Bush administration is inserting politics into the exam room.

These regulations aren’t pleasing to the pro-abortion crowd, but they are a matter of common sense — and that’s why they should be approved in September.

SHARON DE LOS REYES
Grand Junction

One Response to “Rule would allow health-care workers to act on moral convictions”


  1. John B.

    If this has been common practice, then what are the new rules for? Common sense?If you hold yourself out to the general public and receive federal grants provided from taxpayer funds then you should provide services without a “conscience proviso”. Don’t take federal funds and post prominently what you will or will not do and, above all, label your services as not for the general public but only for those who believe a certain way. But why not, Ms.de Los Reyes, come right out and say that you are opposed to abortion, contraception and morning-after remedies and the more people refused such services the better? Why the stealth approach protecting “people of conscience”?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.