I’m writing in response to a recent letter by M.E. Johnson regarding the Orwellian-named Fairness Doctrine.
The essence of the doctrine, which is aimed squarely at A.M. radio, is to require stations to give equal time to both right- and left-wing topics, thus crippling these stations, which are admittedly dominated by conservative content.
For starters, Mr. Johnson offers a list of right-leaning talk show hosts and columnists to bolster his stance that the media is not controlled largely by liberals. If we look closer, however, we will see that each of these folks who are listed have their own liberal counterpart, as with Sean Hannity and Alan Colmes. The same is true with the print media. For example, the same papers that run Mike Rosen also run Maureen Dowd and other liberal pundits. Which brings us to talk radio.
The plain fact of conservative domination of talk radio seems to really stick in the craw of the lefty libs. The fact is, conservatives took a dying format and breathed life into it and it flourished. Since they can’t compete, liberals want to use the force of government (of course) to “regulate” the content and make it more “fair.”
I’d like to introduce an idea that will undoubtedly seem like a radical one to the leftists and libs who are all too willing to give the growing government even more power: Let the free market determine who gets time on A.M. radio. If folks will support it, there are people out there who will pony up the money to promote it. Let the liberals launch their own talk radio network — wait a minute, they already have. It’s called Air America, and it is failing fantastically.
The American people, even liberal Democrats, don’t want to listen to hour after hour of doom and gloom and how our country is the cause of every major problem in this troubled world.
Folks, there are thousands of places to get and give information in this modern age. The Internet is a haven for both sides of the political aisle to posit their viewpoints, along with more TV channels than you can count. Don’t support the so-called Fairness Doctrine, it’s an affront to free-thinking people everywhere.
Freedom, not more government control of what we see and hear. That’s real progressive thinking.
BRADY BLOZVICH
Mack

Posted 1 year, 2 months ago in 












5 Responses to “Freedom, not more goverment control, is needed in radio”
Posted September 12th, 2008 at 4:03 pm Login to Send PM Report this comment
Excellent rebuttal and well thought out.
Posted September 12th, 2008 at 4:08 pm Login to Send PM Report this comment
Amen to that. Mandatory “fairness” in ideas is rarely a good thing, and you always have to consider your opinions if the situation were reversed.
Posted September 12th, 2008 at 4:18 pm Login to Send PM Report this comment
The ‘fairness doctrine’ is legislated censorship of the airwaves.
If one side, regardless of political party, cannot generate enough listeners to justify the cost of producing a show, the corresponding opposing viewpoints will not be aired.
This would put a number of radio stations out of business due to the fact that there can only be so many music stations of any genre in any given market.
And one telemarketing station per market is overkill.
Posted September 13th, 2008 at 4:03 pm Login to Send PM Report this comment
As a tiny handful of Congressional Democrats have expressed support for the Fairness Doctrine, it goes to show that blatant stupidity is not a commodity that is entirely owned by the Republicans.
Posted September 14th, 2008 at 4:58 pm Login to Send PM Report this comment
meh…it isn’t about who’s more hateful, or who’s more popular…what it’s about is a stations’ right to air whom they want without governmental interference…i enjoyed limbaugh simply for the parodies while clinton was in office, but find him seriously lacking without a target in office…i thought tony snow was a very good speaker, and didn’t go too far to the right…i remember some extreme left talk show host somewhere back east when i was driving over the road that simply called anybody even remotely close to moderate a brain-stem, and found it amusing as all get out…kinda like a revers hannity, ya know?…just wish i could remember the name, cause tho i don’t agree with the ideologies, that dude was funny…as for boortz, he can be entertaining, but i have heard him attack both sides and parties, so i don’t really consider him anything more than a complaining entertainer….i guess my point is that you cannot legislate ideology any more than you can morality
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.