Welcome! Please Login or Register.  

Amendment 48 corrects a legal sleight of hand

  • Time Posted 1 year, 1 month ago in General.
  • 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
    Loading ... Loading ...
  • Comments Comments
Tags:   Share:  
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • BlinkList

Amendment 48 States: “Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution defining the term ‘person’ to include any human being from the moment of fertilization as ‘person’ is used in those provisions of the Colorado constitution relating to inalienable rights, equality of justice, and due process of law?”

The unborn are not protected by our laws due to a legal sleight of hand that declares the unborn “non-persons.” Our courts have done a similar thing in the past, declaring blacks as “non-persons.”

In a recent column in The Daily Sentinel, Kathleen  Parker writes, “From American medicine’s most  prominent human embryology text, ‘The Developing Human’:  ‘Human development begins at  fertilization when the male gamete or sperm (spermatozoon) unites with a  female gamete or oocyte (ovum) to produce a single cell — zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marks the beginning of each of us as a unique individual.’  ”

The great Lutheran pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer, who was hanged by the Nazis in 1943, wrote: “Destruction of the embryo in the mother’s womb is a violation of the right to live which God has bestowed on this nascent life. To raise the question whether we are here concerned already with a human being or not is merely to confuse the issue. The simple fact is that God certainly intended to create a human being and that this nascent human being has been deliberately deprived of his life. And that is nothing but murder.”

Jesus says that what we do to the least one of us we do to Him. Surely the unborn are the least of the least.

If “enlighten thinking” can justify that a mother alone has the unique right to take the life of her child then we as a nation, as a community, as individuals can and will justify anything.

By the way, 1,300 volunteers collected 131,245 signatures to put this amendment on the ballot.

MILES LAHUE
PATSY LAHUE
Grand Junction

One Response to “Amendment 48 corrects a legal sleight of hand”


  1. DianaHsieh

    Are you willing to punish a woman with the death penalty or life in prison for aborting a non-viable ectopic pregnancy? To ban the birth control pill and IUD? To ban in vitro fertilization?

    If you’re not, then you shouldn’t vote for Amendment 48. Those would be the real-life consequences granting fertilized eggs full legal rights. To kill or harm a fertilized egg would be a criminal offense under Colorado law, regardless of the circumstances.

    The fact is that Amendment 48 is deeply, profoundly anti-life. For the details, read “Amendment 48 Is Anti-Life: Why It Matters That a Fertilized Egg Is Not a Person,” an issue paper by Ari Armstrong and myself. It’s available for download at:

    http://www.SecularGovernment.us/docs/a48.pdf

    You have no right to force your religious views on the rest of the people of Colorado — just as Muslims have no right to force Christians to pray to Allah five times per day.

    Diana Hsieh
    Founder, Coalition for Secular Government
    http://www.seculargovernment.us

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.