In an open forum, everyone who would read what is posted.

Perhaps Mr. Johnson would like to elaborate, first as to what he understands by the term ‘liberal’, where he wishes to apply it (in reference to what) and second, as to which of our founders, who were almost all ‘political liberasls’ were so handicapped. Naturally, we might also be interested to know what his ‘ample evidence’ consists of.

Actually, the ’size’ of the brain has nothing to do with anything. What is most important is what one does with what one has. That is as true in the world of intellect and education, as it is in the physical world.

One can fill a 1000 gallon container with offal yet, the 1 quart container filled with diamonds is worth far more. Of course, that only applies if one does not take sheer volume as the only measure of value.

There is ample evidence that shows the fully developed liberal brain is 27% smaller than the fully developed Conservative Brain.

Also, the same evidence provides some indication that the liberal brain is not as capable of retaining facts, and in the course of storing factual data, the liberal brain converts a substantial portion of the factual data to fantasy prior to storing the data.

Now my source for this information is billions of pieces of anecdotal evidence, backed up by absolutely zero anecdotal evidence proving me wrong.

Fair enough?

If I were to offer a statement, presented as fact and not sourced by someplace that HE agrees with, it is promptly labeled as unproven and a lie.

I have noticed that he does not place the same requirement on those of his faith.

Actually, Mr. Johnson is once again totally wrong, as I seldom ask what is the ’source’. Others may, but I do not. If I do, it is only to go to it for further information. Nor, as some are prone to do, ever suggest that the other poster is ‘lieing’ or ‘making things up’, no matter how strongly I may disagree. To behave otherwise is to behave in a churlish manner.