Comments on: Palin’s guilt should have been front-page story

By: gate629

gate629 — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:45:58 +0000

The following is per Politifact.com: “But the issue here is Palin’s characterization that the report concluded that she did not do anything ethically wrong. The report concluded just the opposite. The report says she did abuse her authority and she did violate state ethics laws. By saying otherwise repeatedly, in what seems to be a deliberate attempt to mislead or confuse voters who don’t know the facts, Palin isn’t just wrong, she’s Pants on Fire! wrong.”
Politicfact.com has levels of honesty about candidates statements…True, half True, Barely True, Mostly True, False and lastly Pants on Fire wrong.
Per the Alaska Daily News article dated 10-17-08, a second investigation is already in the works about troopergate.
All the above need to check out sites such as Politact.com & Factcheck.org to get unbaised information about this election…just try it…there more reliable than any newspaper

By: Robin

Robin — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:42:08 +0000

You guys are veering off topic. Please move on. Thank you.

By: Scott

Scott — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:36:09 +0000

Completely irrelevant.

You accused RLaitres of being dishonest about the quote in post #1. Unfortunately, he never made such a claim. The quote was in post #6, which has been amply demonstrated. You screwed up, plain and simple. I can see it, everyone else can see it, and I’m sure you can see it too, it just goes against everything you stand for to admit it.

The Willis Leon Johnson two step just keeps going on.

By: Willis_Leon_Johnson

Willis_Leon_Johnson — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:38:58 +0000

That would be you and RL.

Please show where he made any effort to correct the lie in post # 1.

By: Scott

Scott — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:50:36 +0000

What did you accuse RLaitres of being dishonest about, Willis? (Hint: Look at your post #19.)

Now, please quote the post where RLaitres said the quotation he referred to was in post #1. (Hint: You can’t, because he didn’t say that.)

Now whose the one with the literacy problem?

By: RLaitres

RLaitres — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:34:47 +0000

What is quite obvious is that while some wish to discuss, others merely want to argue, and have the ‘last word’, no matter what. Something useful can come out of the first, but absolutely nothing can come from the second and is but a waste of time.

By: Willis_Leon_Johnson

Willis_Leon_Johnson — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:14:09 +0000

Quite obviously Scott, literacy is not your strong suit.

By: Scott

Scott — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:05:05 +0000

Willis,

Let me spell it out for you, since you apparently don’tr understand the situation.

You accused RLaitres of dishonesty - twice (#17 and #19). As evidence of this supposed dishonesty you went on to explain that there were no quote marks in Ullr’s post #1, contrary to what you claimed RLaitres said.

It was pointed out that RLaitres never said that the quote was in Post #1, but was in fact in post #6. Therefore, your claim of dishonesty against RLaitres is without merit. To most people, this would trigger an apology but obviously not in one such as you. Instead, you refer to this proof that you made a mistake as “distracting” the readers. This has nothing to do with the claim of law-breaking, and nothing at all to do with your post #8, which is off-topic by any measure. It seems to be obvious who is attempting to distract people away from what actually happened.

By: dc

dc — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:00:53 +0000

“The democrat perverts name is Tim Mahoney.”

Willis,

He may be a jerk and a contemptable creep, but not a pervert. He had consentual sex with a person of the opposite gender. Where is the perversion there?

By: Willis_Leon_Johnson

Willis_Leon_Johnson — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:59:52 +0000

Yeah, ya really did in post # 1.

” Ullr
Posted October 14th, 2008 at 11:39 am PM This User Report this comment

The reason stories such as Palin’s lawbreaking receive such scant attention in this newspaper is not surprising considering the Sentinel has consistently demonstrated they are the local print equivalent of Fox News. ”

And the report is not quite the same as the verdict.

From her history of taking on the establishment in Alaska, I’m betting that she will be found innocent of all charges.

After all, she was just trying to get an entrenched useless bureaucrat to do his job.

When she exhausted all reasonable attempts, she fired the piece of garbage.

And, to me, firing useless government bureaucrats is an admirable objective that should be encouraged.

Especially right here in happy valley.