Welcome! Please Login or Register.  
 
 

Vote ‘No’ on public-safety issue and school-district bond request

I am writing to urge a “No” vote on the requests from the School District and the city of Grand Junction to plunge us into…more.

City fathers don’t have a handle on costs

I just read the mayor's response to The Daily Sentinel's editorial on proposed fee increases. It seems he has missed the intent with his "we…more.

2A and 2B calls for over-budgeted Taj Mahal building

Only the ballot wording is the law, nothing else matters; not speeches, resolutions (which can be legally weaseled around) or promises by anyone. Only the…more.

City should scale down request for public safety complex

I suggest we vote “No” on both the sales-tax increase request and the attempt to eliminate the city from being on a budget. Let the…more.

Vote ‘Yes’ on 2A, 2B for public safety

After a few months of studying and listening to presentations both for and against the building of a proposed public safety center, I conclude a…more.

City has proven itself worthy of new public-safety complex

All Grand Junction residents should recognize the benefits of passing both questions 2A and 2B this November. Question 2A asks the voters of Grand Junction…more.

Vote ‘No’ on more debt

I believe that the City of Grand Junction needs a new and larger building to accommodate our police department.  Other needs in the public safety…more.

Should we scrimp on public safety?

In Rick Wagner's Sept. 11 column, without mentioning the actual ballot measures 2A and 2B, the public safety improvements, he implies there is plenty…more.

Vote ‘Yes’ on both 2A and 2B

While I think the absolute need for the public-safety initiative has been well established and support ballot measure 2A is there, what is less understood…more.